Tuesday, May 24, 2011
The Next Pitcairn Murder
The citizen driving in Baltimore saw a young man standing in front of his car, and stopped to keep from hitting him. The young man pointed a gun at him, ordered him out of the car, and drove off with it.
A classic carjacking, brazenly carried out in the middle of the afternoon.
The citizen described his assailant as a young African American about 19-21 years old wearing a blue Adidas jacket. But because he was focused more upon the gun than the man's features he could not identify him further.
About two and a half hours later the victim's car got into an accident. The driver, wearing a blue Adidas jacket, jumped out and ran from the scene. Witnesses identified him as "Turtle," an African American male aged 18. Police got a search warrant for Turtle's home, and though Turtle wasn't there, they recovered a blue Adidas jacket. They found Turtle a couple of weeks later and charged him with armed carjacking.
But at the first court hearing, prosecutors dropped all felony counts. Turtle now stands charged only with misdemeanor car theft and traffic violations stemming from the accident.
Does this scenario sound familiar? Last year the accused murderer of Stephen Pitcairn had walked on robbery charges just a few months before the murder. The victim had balked at coming to court, and even though they didn't need him at the first hearing, prosecutors quit on the case immediately.
And candidate Gregg Bernstein excoriated incumbent State's Attorney Pat Jessamy for it. (As did I.) In all likelihood he won a close election against Jessamy because of the Pitcairn case.
Only now the shoe is on Bernstein's foot. Because it was Bernstein's prosecutors who quit on Turtle's case earlier this month.
I tried to find out whether there were issues that I am unaware of, and was given the old "no comment." But from my experience and review of the court file, it looks like a case of chicken.
Prosecutors, without a positive identification from the victim, were just too timid to argue the circumstantial case to a jury, or to prod the police into closing the holes. They wanted the case on a platter. In fact, according to a representative from the Washington Village Development Association, a prosecutor told him that he was "glad" that he didn't have the case, and invited him to watch him review files in a room and see how many cases he has to dismiss.
If true, that guy needs a new line of work. Any prosecutor worth his salt would grab that file and work as hard as he could to get a gun-wielding carjacker off the street, whether that carjacker was Turtle or someone to whom Turtle could point them.
It's particularly distressing that Turtle has the same defense to car theft as to carjacking: (a) it wasn't him in the car, and (b) if it was, someone else gave him the car. So if the defense is the same, and the state witnesses all the same, why drop the felony? Why quit at the first court hearing?
By quitting they dumped the misdemeanor case on the young, inexperienced prosecutors in the District Court, who will be expected to ensure that all witnesses are present (good luck with that) and to know how to introduce photo identification evidence into court. And if by chance they are ready to go, Turtle will ask for a jury trial to make everyone show up to court on another day. That case is as good as gone.
And all leverage and context with it. Because a few days before the carjacking, Turtle's home was raided by police who had information that Turtle was dealing drugs. Officers found drugs in the search and arrested him on felony drug violations. Of course, consistent with city practice, Turtle was released without having to post any bail.
But Turtle was denied bail after his carjacking arrest. He was off the street. Prosecutors now had reason to believe that that he was a drug dealer escalating into violent crime. As I have written before, young men + drugs + guns = DANGER. Turtle was someone to fully focus upon.
Instead prosecutors dropped the carjacking charges, causing a judge to set a bail on the car theft charges. (Turtle hadn't posted the bail when I reviewed the file, but he might.) And despite an "official" from the prosecutor's office telling state Senator Bill Ferguson that they planned to "vigorously" pursue Turtle's felony drug case, it's all headed down the road of probation. After all, his adult record at age 18 is "clean", with just a misdemeanor car theft case pending (or dropped when it comes to trial in June.)
No one wants Bernstein to succeed more than me. And it will take time to change a long-established culture, something I know as much as anyone.
But this case sounds an alarm bell for immediate action. Some things Bernstein can do more quickly than others, and how he handles felony cases in the District Court, especially in light of his own attitude towards the Pitcairn tragedy, should be at the top of his list.
Bernstein suffers from the fact that neither he nor those in his front office have extensive experience in the District Court. When he fired the District Court community coordinators this month for budgetary reasons I flinched, and not just because several single mothers making modest salaries were suddenly tossed into a grim job market. Because a new vision for those jobs could have made District Court prosecution more efficient and responsive to public safety concerns, and ultimately save money.
But even without a District Court background, Bernstein has got to make felony assessment a priority. Or the next Pitcairn murder, where prosecutors fail to even try, will occur on his watch.